Mimi, I agree there is usually a limit of trials that can be entered, but why not just ask your fellow Ala's to put some up? They are usually more then happy to do it, mostly because they know they may need some one day, and because they are nice. I understand your opinion, but in all reality, people will not put in dogs just to give other people a chance, and reducing the amount a person can put in a trail, reduces the amount of people trialing. Is this really good for ala?

But still, any time I trial with my foundies or customs, I don't stand a chance. It would be a total waste of money against a maxed capped dog. May as well not trial period. e.e

I voted for 1, but I have a few reasons for this. I think this would also solve the problem of the trials disappearing so fast. I haven't been on as much lately, but I've seen it where there's been almost no trials to be had because people have come in (me included) and swept them. So yeah, it might be that people with higher stat and capped dogs have to wait a bit, but they can always trial team a different way -- Put a high stat and a low stat in so that someone else will have a chance. Spread the wealth around and let the economy balance itself a bit.

I could stomach all of the choices EXCEPT the first one. Not unless people want to compete against my capped dogs, I usually run them in trials against my own dogs.

I don't think trialing should be removed completely from the game, changing the prizes or even entry fees, or limiting a dogs trials to perhaps 4 a day or 4 every 12 hours, I don't think limiting the number of dogs a single player can enter into a trial would be fair since newer players would never stand a chance of wining a trial with lower tp and not fully maxed dogs.

someone mentioned in chat that the money spent in the main shops is just removed from the economy, is there a way that that money could somehow be returned to the economy,which would probably help it some

Just a thought

Please don't limit the number of dogs one person can enter in a trial. Thrn those of us who cannot afford MWB will be constantly beat in trials by monster or capped dogs. This is totally unfair.

There is an option missing in the poll. what about "none of the above?"

Trialing works rather well after the last fixes. I would rather there be no change or, what has been discussed before, that we get the option to enter dogs in TP based trials.

I really think there should be an option on trials to limit the TP, if you will be limiting how much we can trial. It is not fair for someone to enter 2 lower generation dogs, then have someone enter 2 TP capped dogs and win everything. This way, you can be sure your dog will only be competing at a level with dogs of the same or similar training