is trying to
private chat with you.
I just have to stick my nose in, here...the only reason it's referred to as a hypothesis is that it is technically impossible to prove, without any sliver of doubt, something as complex and time-spanning as evolutionary theories. It doesn't dampen its credibility in any way; it's just arguing semantics for lack of anything else to debate.
there is no aditude its a fact, its stated in science books. if it comes off as my having a additude its the way you are reading it.
Please drop the attitude, it's really not necessary.
The word theory, when used by scientists, refers to an explanation of reality that has been thoroughly tested so that most scientists agree on it. It can be changed if new information is found. Theory is different from a working hypothesis, which is a theory that hasn't been fully tested; that is, a hypothesis is an unproven theory.<br /><br />try and read the WHOLE definishion<br><br>
A hypothesis (from Greek ὑπόθεσις; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. The term derives from the Greek, ὑποτιθÎναι – hypotithenai meaning "to put under" or "to suppose." For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories. Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously in common and informal usage, a scientific hypothesis is not the same as a scientific theory. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis.
Educated Guess = Hypothesis.<br /><br />Theory = Hypothesis widely regarded as fact.
"Big bang IS a theory"
No the big bang theory is a Educated Guess they cant recreate it they can't. please read the definashions. and as for not haveing any proof where is the proof of where the matter came eather so lets throw that out the windo until science can PROVE where it came from making your statement wrong as well.
You don't have to. You argument simply doesn't stack up as well as Evolution does. That's not your fault. It's just that the bible has nearly no evidence to support it (actually..no evidence, really) and evolution/big bang does. <br /><br />There's nothing to suggest that a giant bearded man is up in the sky making decisions. Where as the big bang IS a theory because it's widely accepted as being true.
i never said the bible was fact as a matter of fact i have stated my ideas on the bible SEVERAL times. go back and read. i will not repet myself again.
Which would make the bible an uneducated guess, not a fact?
Sorry. Hit the back button by accident.