<br /> “Evil does not exist, or at least it does not exist <br /> unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, <br /> a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create <br /> evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God’s love <br /> present in his heart. It’s like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the <br /> darkness that comes when there is no light.”<br /> <br /> I’m a very strong Christian; I believe 100% in the bible and follow it best I can. Actually, if you do your research the evolution theory does not make any sense, because though they say things evolved from different things they have yet to actually discover the ‘link’, meaning the bones of the something that was in the middle of evolving. Also, carbon dating is only reliable for specimens which only date back a few thousand years, how can someone say it is millions of years old if any results beyond that few thousand years is a highly problematic? As for the “Why is their starving children in Africa if there is a God” question, that’s simple. When sin entered the world it brought with it all these problems from disease to hunger to murder and so on. God didn’t make robots; he made us with free will, which is why we are here today. God knows what he’s doing, and we cannot comprehend it no matter how hard we think. It would be like an ant trying to understand a human; we don’t have the capacity to comprehend it. We just have to trust. Also, what do Christians have to lose? If what evolution says is true (Which it’s not, but for argument sake ;) ) then it’s not like we get punished for believing in Christ. However, when Jesus comes back those who do not believe will very much regret it in the end. There is more proof that Jesus walked the earth than there is George Washington was the first American president, that’s not false statistics either. =) <br />

I think Jambers is just confused.

They see me trollin', they hatin'...

<br /> I do not mean this to be offensive. I am genuinely bewildered, curious, and only one conclusion seems logical, so..<br /><br />Jambers, are you a troll?<br /><br /><img src="http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/1062/trollspeedoflight2.png">

---

Just for giggles I read the debate board, but seriously I am extremely confused by Jambers. Edit: oh I am for evolution. Atheist here *raise's hand*

---

This is not a lack of understanding nor ability to understand on my part. You've not presented a coherent, rational argument at all. What you <i>did</i> post was countered, and then you just repeated the same thing over and over. <br /><br />If that's me not understanding "what's right in front of me," then...all right. But I feel that you've been answered thoroughly by multiple people, and you have failed to present any other cogent points for debate. If there's nothing available to which I can reply, how am I supposed to make a reasonable, rational counter?

then your reading them, but not getting my belief points. thats not my folt if you cant understand something thats right there in frunt of you

Seconded. -__-

Because your posts aren't clear in any way; they don't make a connection in a satisfactory manner.

---

if youve read it then i dont see why i would have to tell you how it connects.